New drug better for breast cancer

By Lauran Neergaard, Associated Press

WASHINGTON — A newer drug prevents breast cancer in older, high-risk women just as well as today's standby tamoxifen but with fewer side effects, the National Cancer Institute announced Monday.

Called raloxifene, the newer drug already is sold to treat bone-thinning osteoporosis.

But the striking new results, from a government study of nearly 20,000 women, suggest that raloxifene may supplant its older cousin as the first choice for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women at high risk of developing the disease.

"Now women have a choice," Dr. Leslie Ford, NCI's cancer prevention chief, said Monday. "It's good news because we're giving you a choice with fewer side effects."

Twenty-five of the 20,000 women who took part in the study came from Dr. Simon Tchekmedyian's Pacific Shores Medical Group oncology practice in Long Beach.

Tchekmedyian said he was told Monday that about half the patients who have been involved in the study for two to five years took raloxifene, and was in the process of notifying his patients.

"We can show that we have two alternatives two medications that can be equally effective," he said. "However, in the area of tolerability, it appears that raloxifene is actually an improvement because some of the side effects, especially serious side effects, seem to be less with raloxifene."

Manufacturer Eli Lilly & Co., which sells raloxifene under the brand name Evista, plans to seek Food and Drug

http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3720810 4/18/2006

Administration approval for the new use.

Until now, tamoxifen has been the only drug approved to reduce the chances of breast cancer striking high-risk women.

Both drugs are "selective estrogen response modulators" they act like the estrogen hormone in some tissues but like an anti-estrogen in others.

Estrogen can fuel certain breast cancers, making tamoxifen a longtime top choice both to prevent the disease's return in women with estrogen-sensitive tumors and to reduce the odds of it striking high-risk women in the first place.

However, tamoxifen causes some rare but serious side effects: The drug acts like an estrogen in the uterus and bloodstream, thus increasing users' risk of getting uterine cancer or a life-threatening blood clot.

Raloxifene is a close chemical relative, and earlier research suggested it might help breast cancer, too. So the NCI launched the $88 million study to compare the two.

Taking either tamoxifen or raloxifene daily for up to five years cut in half women's chances of developing invasive breast cancer, NCI announced Monday.

Raloxifene caused the same side effects, but not as many. Its users had 36 percent fewer uterine cancers and 29 percent fewer blood clots, according to initial results of the "Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene," or STAR project. Raloxifene users also suffered fewer vision- _{Advertisement}blocking cataracts.

While the reduction in those side effects was significant, the study also showed how uncommon the effects are. Thirty-six tamoxifen users developed uterine cancers, compared with 23 raloxifene users. The risk of blood clots was similarly low: 54 tamoxifen users had one in the lung, compared with 35 raloxifene users.

The new study means no change for premenopausal women there's no data showing whether raloxifene is safe for them, said STAR researcher Dr. Kathy Albain of Loyola University.

Nor does it mean that tamoxifen users should

necessarily switch, she said. Women currently are prescribed tamoxifen for five years, and its breast-cancer prevention benefit continues even after they stop taking the drug as raloxifene's seems to. So a woman already in, say, year four of her tamoxifen course with no sign of side effects probably has little to gain by switching, she explained.

But that's a question researchers were girding for as they spent Monday notifying study participants of the results.

http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3720810 4/18/2006

One puzzle: While raloxifene was equally effective in blocking invasive breast cancer, it didn't protect quite as well as tamoxifen against noninvasive types of breast cancer such as ductal carcinoma in situ, noted Dr. Len Lichtenfeld of the American Cancer Society.

That type of tumor isn't life-threatening and shouldn't water down the overall message of raloxifene's benefit, said Dr. Victor Vogel of the University of Pittsburgh, who oversaw the study's design.

Among postmenopausal women, who's at high risk? Most of the study participants had a 4-percent chance of getting breast cancer within five years because of advanced age, a close relative with the disease, never having a child or having one late in life, or other well-known risk factors that women can calculate on a government Web site: http://cancer.gov/bcrisktool.

In simpler terms, for every 1,000 of those women, doctors expected 40 to develop breast cancer within five years if they did nothing, but taking one of the drugs cut that number to 20, Ford explained.

On the Net:

NCI study information: www.cancer.gov/star

Staff writer Karen Robes contributed to this report.

RETURN TO TOP

Updated: April 18, 2006

z L.A. budgets for social services z Clerk to probe L.B. ballot problems z No Child Left Behind count skewed, AP study finds z Mom, daughter brawl at park z Blue Line crash not an accident? z Movie extra gets life in prison z L.B. DA named judge z Memories of the Killing Fields still raw z Ariz. immigrant crime bill vetoed z Local crime briefs z Level playing fields? z St. Mary acquires new diagnostic equipment z New drug better for breast cancer z Man in Ferrari crash pleads not guilty z Bombing in Israel kills 9 z Paramount may turn milk into gold z Avalanche hits Mammoth run z Bolten tells Bush aides to go now z 2 papers win Pulitzers for Katrina work z Senator sees C-17 future z Former Illinois governor convicted of corruption z Mexican bus crash kills 67 z Foster receives ex-rival's support z Local news briefs z Terror drill at airport on Sat. z Librarian knew his place z Karches was Wall St. bigwig z Iran centrifuge claims questioned z Director signs plea bargain z Say What?!?

http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3720810 4/18/2006

Memories of Killing Fields Lakers vs Suns Dodgers vs Giants Angels vs Orioles Cafe Sevilla & IL Padrino Celebrities visit Children's Hospital

View our photo gallery archive

Privacy Policy

http://presstelegram.com/news/ci_3720810 4/18/2006